CMA review: Final findings and recommendations

December 12, 2018 Categories: Fiduciary Management, Governance & Regulation

What are the final findings and recommendations from the CMA report?


The final report


This post was going to be a reaction to Theresa May’s meaningful vote, but it looks as though that will have to wait for a while. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) however, have stepped in to fill the void. Today they published the final report in their market investigation into investment consultancy and fiduciary management.

The final report confirms many of the findings and recommendations announced in July’s provisional report. Read our blog outlining the provisional findings. 


Findings and recommendations: Weaker in some areas


The CMA’s final report shows that they are standing by July’s proposed remedies, but they have chosen to somewhat weaken the language in certain areas. The key findings and recommendations are:

  1. Mandatory tendering to be introduced when pension trustees first purchase fiduciary management
  2. Greater support for tendering from the Pensions Regulator
  3. Common performance reporting standards for both fiduciary managers and investment consultants has been reduced to report performance of managers using basic minimum standards
  4. Fiduciary management firms required to provide greater clarity on costs
  5. The requirement for trustees to set objectives when they hire an investment consultant has been dropped
  6. An additional requirement for investment consultants to clearly separate the marketing of fiduciary management from advice has been added


Better outcomes for pension funds


My colleagues and I have previously stated our support for these proposed remedies and continue to believe that they will lead to better outcomes for pension funds. We’ve been working over the course of the year to ensure that we continue to provide our clients and prospective clients with the transparency they require.

Performance standards

The performance standards that have been developed are a good step forward and we will continue to support this initiative. As a trustee myself, I believe that in order to perform our job effectively, we need more than just reporting on managers or products conforming to basic minimum standards.


The addition of a recommendation requiring investment consultants to clearly distinguish between investment advice and marketing of FM services gets to the nub of a major issue and will be very beneficial to trustees.


Looking forward


Even in advance of today’s final report, many clients have begun implementing the recommendations and we look forward to working with many more clients next year.


Related Posts
The changing landscape of fiduciary management: Spotlight on the CMA reforms
Fiduciary Management service – what does it look like?
The broken consulting model and how fiduciary management can help you


David Rae, Managing Director, Head of Strategic Client Solutions, EMEA


  1. No comments yet.


For Professional Clients Only.

This material does not constitute an offer or invitation to anyone in any jurisdiction to invest in any Russell Investments Investment product or use any Russell Investments Investment services where such offer or invitation is not lawful, or in which the person making such offer or invitation is not qualified to do so, nor has it been prepared in connection with any such offer or invitation.

Unless otherwise specified, Russell Investments is the source of all data. All information contained in this material is current at the time of issue and, to the best of our knowledge, accurate. Any opinion expressed is that of Russell Investment, is not a statement of fact, is subject to change and does not constitute investment advice.

The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and is not guaranteed. You may not get back the amount originally invested.